case law for vcsst - An Overview

case law for vcsst - An Overview

Blog Article

These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more

Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It's perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only performed if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

The official court record is maintained with the court of record. Copies of case file documents will not be accessible within the search site and will need to get ordered from the court of record.  

one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more

Because of this, just citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in these-and-this sort of neighborhood, without actually supplying them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood trying to find british company law cases their phone is probably going to be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a effectively-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, guarantee law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender along with the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Statutory laws are All those created by legislative bodies, such as Congress at both the federal and state levels. Although this kind of legislation strives to form our society, furnishing rules and guidelines, it would be not possible for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

States also generally have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court as well as precedent, case legislation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision through the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is not really strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one particular district court in Ny isn't binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning could possibly help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions through the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more